Brave New Traveler - Online Travel Magazine

Does The Internet Cheapen Your Travel Experience?

Guy Tech Travel

Illustration by Jacob Bielanski

Take a look at this website. The text, the picture above, the pictures below, the logo - all of them represent a separate request by your computer to a server hosted somewhere else on the planet.

With each request, a packet was generated that had to find a path through a myriad of trails. It is very likely that each one of these requests took a different path. And it will be a whole new set of paths and destinations when you click away from here.

In a way, technology embodies the spirit of adaptation so prevalent in travelers.

Throughout history, technology has found a home only when it can be taken for granted.

What seems like a simple act today (reading the seemingly benign musings of a short, unshaven, American writer) represents the culmination of over 60 years of communications theory, practice, business, revision and exploitation.

Millions of minds, with millions of hours of training devoting millions of hours of sweat, have developed a multi-homed, self-rectifying infrastructure that can link editors, photographers, writers, and readers who may as well all be 10,000 miles from each other.

In the flood of information known as “the Internet” do we lose the sense of adventure that comes from discovering a destination?

We can book our plane, hotel, car, hostel, hotel, itinerary, museum, tour guide, bus and restaurant reservation before we even take those first tentative steps out of our comfort zone.

A plethora of sites offering pictures, reviews and personal testimonies ensure that we know exactly what’s going to happen long before we even attempt to do it.

Yet, in the cataclysmic-yet-searchable flood of information that has become known as “the Internet” do we lose the sense of adventure that comes from discovering a destination?

Any Trip, At A Price

I have a confession to make: I’ve watched “Legends of the Fall” approximately five times.

I’m always enamored with Brad Pitt’s character, Tristan, and his mysterious travels. Riding off into the sunset on a horse, he somehow finds himself on a ship at sea. The scenes flash between those anxiously awaiting his return, and his exploits as a hunter/fisherman in exotic island nations.

Googling “Pacific rim sailing boar hunting” shows me that I can have Tristan’s adventures, sans Frontier-style heartbreak, for only $3,170.

Wherever there is a desire to “do something”, there is a business waiting to capitalize on that desire. (And they always seem to have a website).

Reservations At An Instant

Circuit Board

A chance encounter between an IBM salesman and the (then) CEO of American Airlines C. R. Smith in 1953 led to a technological framework that would become the core of all airline reservations.

The Semi-Automatic Business Research Environment (SABRE) made it easier for Airlines to manage reservations internally. It used punch cards.

In 1976, a similar system developed by United Airlines was first offered directly to travel agents, in order to extend the grasp of efficient airline reservations. It wasn’t until the mid-nineties that reservations would leave the ticketing agents and fall into the hands of the common Joe.

Thank you, “Internet.”

Why does this break down an economic barrier? Prior to Computerized Reservation Systems (CRS), Airline reservations were taken care of using a series of cards and 8 people.

The “shopping” process of locating and securing a reservation on a flight took—at best—90 minutes. Even after the advent of reservation systems, a traveler wasn’t home free. If you weren’t at the mercy of an apathetic Airline employee, you were still leaving your itinerary in the hands of a travel agent’s competency.

You don’t know what Galileo and SABRE are, but they radically changed our travel experiences.

One was either ridiculously dedicated to travel or saved a ridiculous amount of money to cover the travel agent’s surcharge.

When I was a small lad, a ticket from Houston to Chicago cost almost $300. In 2005 my wife put together a flight to Germany. By sliding dates around and checking with multiple travel sites, we came to an excellent itinerary. Chicago to Dublin, Dublin to Frankfurt. It was less than $400 a person.

The economic impact of traveling to Texas a few years ago is almost equivalent to that of crossing the Atlantic today.

Been There, Done That

What I hate most about planning any trip is the ultimate deflation that occurs upon ‘Googling’.

Having pointed at a map and said “That’s where we’re going!” I get a rush, a feeling like I’ll be stepping into uncharted territory - until I type it into Google and discover that tours run there daily, between 10 and 5 in the summer.

Apparently a lot of people–and developers–have been to Ocracoke since Blackbeard’s death in 1718.

This doesn’t mean that people didn’t go to these places prior to the Internet age, but it does make the process of reading about it much simpler.

While thousands of travelogues published daily help 9-to-5 prisoners transcend their bounds and become mentally transported to exotic locales, they also serve to destroy the nomad’s private fantasy of trailblazing.

That’s Going On The Blog

girltrainThe watering of the over-consumed, all-inclusive travel liquor doesn’t end once the flight takes off.

In the bygone era of a pre-imperialist United States (Canada and the War of 1812 doesn’t count, sorry), American author Mark Twain documented a journey on the first Trans-Atlantic pleasure cruise in the book “The Innocents Abroad“.

The book was based on letters dispatched to his sponsors. Hand-carved lithographs (I made some in high school Art…they’re not easy) provided a crude, grainy representations of the sites that Twain–in his infinite literary abilities–could only begin to describe.

It took two years from the time the letters were written, to the book’s publication in 1869.

Perhaps it’s unfair to place a Travelpod user’s recollection of a dingy cafe in Mexico City side-by-side to a classic work of American non-fiction. Yet the reality remains that a drunken night in Sydney can be recollected, edited, and posted to a “universal” audience faster than it takes to fully recover from the hangover.

A well-meaning writer’s analysis of a culture can be misguided at best, or downright inaccurate at worst. We’ve all felt the sting of misinformation that that breeds rapidly in a democratic pool of blogs.

Information must now be tagged, indexed and amalgamated by sites such as the venerable Brave New Traveler if it is to hold any merit. The market value of travel information has dropped significantly.

A Long Story Short

The first noble truth on Buddha’s path to enlightenment is that suffering is a part of life.

While technology hastens the dispersal of information, it does not improve its ability to be processed by the end user. Travel has entirely to do with what we bring with us; our wits, our hopes, our preconceptions and–most importantly–our failings.

Here is an example of the marvelous power of modern techno-travel:

I booked an itinerary from Barcelona, Spain to Krakow, Poland while camping along the Mediterranean Sea. The reservation was made for me vicariously via an email to a relative.

I also arranged for a money transfer to greet me upon arrival. All I had to do was make it to the Barcelona-Girona Airport at the right time and money would be waiting for me in Krakow.

Barcelona has two airports. There will be no prize for guessing which one we were at, penniless, an hour before takeoff.

The experience following is a long story, but involved cheating a cab with a bad credit card (and failing), almost having luggage confiscated by an angry non-English speaking cab driver, a mad race through Barcelona, some well deserved beers at a nearby bar, and a night sleeping outside of the train station.

It changed me forever. It was the time of my life. Funny enough, the actual experience had little to do with the technology that set the wheels in motion.

Capturing The Dimensions

The road less traveled is still there, reminding us that the universe continues to operate with or without our consent.

My technology peers and I used to giggle at people’s claims that computers “did things” by themselves. Technology only does what we request of it.

A web server cannot coerce you into reconsidering your destination. A MySQL database cannot catalog how we feel during a given experience nor capture the extent to which it changes our life. Even YouTube can’t capture the smell of a crowded market if its viewer lacks the frame of reference.

As a result, technology is a reflection of only what we’ve put into it. It’s an organic system, so complex—and yet so robust—that it has begun to evolve alongside us.

Don’t believe me? Since you’re sitting at a computer, try this (Windows users only, sorry)

  • 1. Go to Start->run
  • 2. Type “cmd” (no quotes) in the box that appears
  • 3. Press enter
  • 4. Type “tracert www.google.com” (no quotes) into the box that appears
  • 5. Press “enter”
  • 6. Watch as the request tells you the path it took to get to Google
  • 7. Wait a minute, then repeat

Think of each of those entries as a “turn” in a list of directions. Watch as the request to Google finds a new path, determined by speed, reliability and congestion.

Though it is not impossible for two packets to take the same path, they have been designed to react in the same way as humans. Just as in the real world, the two journeys to the same destination don’t necessarily take the same route.

The line between what the Internet can and cannot do for us can seem fuzzy. There are many skeptics in the realm of technology—I should know, I’m one of them.

It’s hard to remember that in this forest of bits and electrons, two roads can still diverge. The road less traveled is still there, reminding us that the universe continues to operate with or without our consent.

Do we allow the Internet to take us down that road that many have traveled or do we, like the data, follow the best opportunities?

Technology won’t cheapen our travel experience. Only we will.

What do you think about the Internet’s impact on travel? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Jacob Bielanski is a Technical College dropout from the boonies who drinks too much. His one-eyed cat “Spudnick”, travel-sized dog “Norm” and sexy photographer wife do most of the work. You can find his ramblings on his blog and his “real” writing at any place that ponies up the dough.

Jacob Bielanski

Jacob Bielanski is a Technical College dropout from the boonies who drinks too much. His one-eyed cat “Spudnick”, travel-sized dog “Norm” and sexy photographer wife do most of the work. You can find his ramblings on his blog and his “real” writing at any place that ponies up the dough.

| Share on Facebook | Stumble it!

13 Comments »

  1. Comment by speedyop — March 10, 2008

    “the world needs everything, exept more data”
    michel houellebecq

  2. Comment by Daniel Harbecke — March 10, 2008

    Interesting question. And I like how you answer it in the last sentence.

    The same argument can be made about innovations in mass media, which normally means TV, radio and the Web - but, especially in the case of travel, also encompasses the highway system, passports and air travel.

    When Paul Fussell wrote about travel vs. tourism (oh, no - not THAT again…), it was less about defining a class of people, more about an experience being altered by politics and modern conveniences. Fussell was front row center to watch a mode of experience change before his eyes. But it’s (still) premature to declare travel dead.

    Why? Because definition and meaning aren’t the same. I know what Algeria is. I know that 120 degree Farhenheit is damn hot. But I’ve never been there, and have no illusions I don’t have a clue about what it is to really be there. It’s the difference between definition and meaning: definition’s public, meaning’s subjective.

    I can see Rio de Janeiro on TV in hi-def and Dolby surround. But you know what? It’s still a flat projection with tiny little speakers. No humid air steaming on your skin. No smell of popcorn and bacon, empanadas, or streetside grills with dollar skewers of meat. No sense of weight pressing into your shoes, no twist of rumpled marble streets beneath them. No stretch of time, no feel of being swallowed by a city. No discovery. No autonomy. No dangers or victories, or luck. Just a flat box showing you a second-hand camera sketch.

    Three truisms:
    1) You find what you look for,
    2) There’s still plenty out there you have no idea about, and
    3) It may have all been done before, but now it’s your turn.

    Jacob, thank you for pointing out that the experience of travel is a matter of choice: how you face the moment you’re in.

    “Technology won’t cheapen our travel experience. Only we will.”

    Brother, you made my day…

  3. Comment by Julie — March 10, 2008

    JB-
    SOO happy to see your byline here, and I’m in total agreement with Daniel about your last line, which says it all.
    But for a minute there–
    “Yet the reality remains that a drunken night in Sydney can be recollected, edited, and posted to a “universal” audience faster than it takes to fully recover from the hangover.

    A well-meaning writer’s analysis of a culture can be misguided at best, or downright inaccurate at worst. We’ve all felt the sting of misinformation that that breeds rapidly in a democratic pool of blogs.”–

    I was worried you were going to come to a different conclusion.
    You’ve definitely tapped into a subject that’s on (travel) writers’ minds. Abha Malpani posted some relevant musings on the subject over at Written Road yesterday, and a recent article in British GQ flapped on about what the “democracy of blogs” means for culture and critical thinking.
    In my own humble opinion, the state of both is already questionable, so I don’t think bloggers will much harm it.
    In fact, I think that in solid, healthy online communities where people have respect for travel and for one another, they’re not afraid to pipe up when someone misrepresents a place. Besides, they’re certainly not likely to do much worse than magazine travel writers who flit in and out of places for periods of time that are often shorter still (and who fail, in the interim between the visit and the publication, to check their facts, as noted in a recent WorldHum post). Thanks for this piece. -Julie

  4. Comment by Lola Akinmade — March 10, 2008

    “A well-meaning writer’s analysis of a culture can be misguided at best, or downright inaccurate at worst. We’ve all felt the sting of misinformation that that breeds rapidly in a democratic pool of blogs.”

    Very true. As a travel writer, one typically writes about and analyzes a culture based on their experiences and interactions - good or bad. Being able to move around seamlessly by being perceived as a local immigrant had always worked for me up until a recent trip to an island. Though my experience was far from bad, I could not immerse myself as quickly as I would have loved to. All facets of a culture must be shared and as a sporadic blogger, choosing whether or not to blog about one’s experiences is always a judgment call.

    A very insightful topic. Well done JB!.

    “The road less traveled is still there, reminding us that the universe continues to operate with or without our consent”.. Great line!

  5. Comment by Nathan S — March 10, 2008

    As a young and tech-savvy adult getting close to embarking on my first big ’round-the-world trip, I have to say that your article really hit home with me. I was just having this conversation today with a (soon-to-be-former) co-worker.

    I’ve spent the last few months actively researching and planning my trip — with some paper books, but mostly online through reading blogs, forums, and travel magazine sites like BNT.

    Though I love this information and it helps keep me excited about my trip and gives me ideas, I feel like I’ve almost reached a point of personal backlash against reading travel advice and narratives online. I don’t want my perceptions of a place or what my trip should be like to be affected by someone else’s opinions or views. Sure, there’s plenty of very useful information out there, but I’ve decided to step back somewhat. I’ve still got my favorite sites and blogs on my RSS feed, and I’ll read them, but I’m starting to filter the information and step back from it.

    Just this morning before work, I specifically felt a bit of near disappointment as I read the first post blog post on Boots ‘n All of a guy before he left on his trip. It was very eerily similar to what I’ve written in my own blog on my “About” page. We’re both quitting the 9 to 5, about the same age, going for the same reasons, etc. etc. In a sense, it did take the wind out of my sails a little bit — I’m not special, some other dude has done the same thing.

    I’ll be curious to evaluate my perceptions once I’m on the road as well. I’ll have a small laptop with me and I wonder if it and the internet that comes with it will end up being some sort of security blanked that could cheapen my experience and take out of the place and experience I’m in.

    This is all not to say that I don’t view the resources available online as a massively beneficial resource, but I’ve decided to temper my exposure to other people’s points of view and take a step back. I want to leave some exploration to myself rather than digesting what some dude on Road Junky or the Thorntree think of a place.

    I want my trip to be my own and I want to experience it on my own, unfiltered terms. I’ll be damned if I let the internet get in the way of that!

  6. Comment by pam — March 10, 2008

    Perhaps it’s unfair to place a Travelpod user’s recollection of a dingy cafe in Mexico City side-by-side to a classic work of American non-fiction.

    One of the coolest things about travelblogging is that there’s the very real possibility that it’s NOT unfair, that the dingy cafe in Mexico City experience is totally worthy of the highest literary praise, that the writer could very well deserve to be shoulder to shoulder with Mark Twain. I love it whenever I stumble over well written, inspiring prose on some stranger’s travelblog. LOVE it.

    That point aside, most of what you say makes perfect sense. An excellent read. Thanks.

  7. Comment by Tim Patterson — March 11, 2008

    I just want to echo what others have already said - terrific post, JB.

  8. Comment by Haley January Eckels — March 11, 2008

    “Even YouTube can’t capture the smell of a crowded market”

    What a great insight. This reminds me of an advertisement I saw for a high-def DVD set called “Italy from the Air,” or some nonsense like that. Watch helicopter footage of Brunelleschi’s dome instead of seeing it yourself. It makes you wonder who exactly reads our blogs/articles. Is it those who would never make such a journey themselves, or is it for the other travelers who are just looking for kindred spirits?

  9. Comment by Julie — March 11, 2008

    Chiming in again…I totally agree with Pam’s sentiments.

    I also wanted to ask, though, why we sometimes trust books as a more legitimate source of information than a blog. That’s not to say that all blogs are trustworthy or accurate, of course, but I think we often view books (or print travel magazines or the newspaper) as inherently more credible than electronic sources. They’re not necessarily, and for a lot of reasons. The more I read the kind of good writing Pam is talking about, the more I’m convinced that blogs are where it’s at– it being the spirit and greatest degree of authenticity of a place. Many of the folks writing blogs on Matador, for instance, aren’t travelers who, like NY Times travel writers, are flying out of a place as quickly as they flew into it. Most of them are place-based writers exploring and living in places in a deep way… as a result, they’re able to get their finger on the pulse of a place in a way that print-based travel writers rarely can. I find that incredibly exciting…especially since I’m not so concerned about the originality factor of travel. Pretty much everything I can think of probably has been done… but that doesn’t mean all the stories and experiences have been sucked dry.

    And are we occasionally burned out on reading others’ stories because they’re so easy to access-just a keystroke away–rather than a few subway stops or a drive away at the bookstore or library?

  10. Comment by Jacob — March 11, 2008

    I just thought I’d let you all know: The word count for this article was 1,760 with titles/subtitles.

    The word count of the comments currently sits at 1,603. It seems BNT just got two articles for the price of one. ;)

    Julie/Pam: It occurs to me that I wasn’t looking forward with that statement. Even the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics sees the occupation of “writer” moving more and more towards “online mediums” (e.g. blogs). Spot on!

    Nathan S.: I try and keep my internet reading about destinations as dry as possible; the Cia World Fact book is a great place to get nothing but *facts* about a country.

    Daniel: Its funny you bring up other advancements. At the core of my musings is an attack on a cycle of kids-these-days-have-it-too-easy-ism. Every generation in every facet of life is quick to point out how some new technology “changes” things–and it always seems to be for the worse. Today it’s the internet that will destroy the fabric of ‘merica–yesterday it was Rock’n'roll, color TV, radio, and women’s suffrage.

    Tim: Your’s and Ian’s efforts lend a legitemacy to my writing that I’m not sure I could supply on my own. ;) Thanks, man.

    All: Thank you all for your praise and, more importantly, your astute observations.

    I’m curious…did anyone actually do the “tracert http://www.google.com” thing?

  11. Comment by Daniel Harbecke — March 11, 2008

    I did! I did! And boy, it was COOL! ;)

  12. Comment by Terry — March 11, 2008

    Don’t know what to make of this.

    Let me organize the flood of data first.

  13. Comment by shakester — March 11, 2008

    I read/reseaerch quite a bit on the net, but somehow find myself perpetually wary about stumbling onto an experience in print that I would rather have had myself. I read blogs, travelogues and experience pieces on places usually only *after* I have been to them, because I dont want to be unsurprised by everything I see/come across.

    For people like me, who make shorter travel trips (not a few months buta couple of weeks at best, usually), some amount of pre-trip research is invaluable. I’d love to one day wander without knowing when I ma leaving this town for the next, or indeed how. But till I have that luxury I will have to try and book a hostel to stay in, check out my travel ticket options etc…

    Oh, and I get so sticky, I almost never look at pics of the place I am going to. I avoid flickr on that entirely, even skip the photo pages of my guidebook! :)

Leave a comment

Please note: If this is your first comment, it will be moderated.

Get BNT by Email


Jump To Category:

Latest In Life

Latest Comments