On Saturday, I attended a workshop on sacred activism, where the instructor showed this video of environmentalist Paul Hawken’s speech at the 2006 Bioneers conference:
At the beginning of the speech, he says:
It is my belief that we are part of a movement that is greater and deeper and broader than we ourselves know or can know. It flies under the radar of the media by and large. It is nonviolent, it is grassroots. It has no cluster bombs, no armies, no helicopters. It has no central ideology. A male vertebrae is not in charge…it is growing and spreading worldwide, with no exception.
Hawken goes on to describe this movement as the intertwining of indigenous culture, the environment, and social justice. During his speech, on the black screen behind him, runs a list of the 130,000 minimum organizations in the world dedicated to social and environmental justice.
The power of using this tool came when he noted that the list would have taken the full three days of the conference to witness every single name. And though some of these groups employ traditional means of activism, such as loud protests, walking around with signs, or chaining oneself to a storefront, others take a quieter approach.
Sacred Activism
This “new” form of activism can happen alone through the way one decides to live their life (i.e. only shopping locally, so that you know where your food/clothes come from and that the people producing them are garnering a fair wage), or as part of a group via such avenues as microloans or community bartering.
The basic premise combines the tenets of social justice and spiritual connection.
I personally believe we are in a time of shifting perspectives, understanding that the us-vs.-them mentality has mostly lead to pain, war, and a whole lot of bloodshed. It seems that if we engage long enough with anything, there is the possibility of finding common ground, collaborating, and maybe most important of all, feeling a sense of compassion.
This might just be the new world order.
Holy War
Or am I just being naive and living in a bubble? As we watch peaceful protesters lose their lives in Peru, and big oil once again failing to be reprimanded for human and environmental degradation, Hawken’s words can ring as hollow.
China continues its oppression of Tibet (and Lhasang Tsering doesn’t think the Dalai Lama’s “Middle Way” is working), and no matter how much we hope and pray for a positive outcome for both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it seems to barrel forward.
Plus, our religious divisions worldwide seem to be growing larger instead of being bridged.
So is this where we are actually headed instead?
Illustration: Geoff Olson
Do you think we moving toward a better future or one of annihilation? Share your thoughts below.
About the Author
Related Posts
6 Comments... join the discussion!
-
-
Thank YOU, Josh…beautifully put.
↵ -
Nice article, Christine. I think sacred activism is a wonderful way of putting it.
I tend to agree with Josh, and think the fractal analogy is very apt.
It’s all about consciousness. We are part of a great, unfolding narrative of the universe; the universe becoming conscious of itself, if you like. Every single thing we do contributes to this story, and as our world views become more evolved, and as we become ever more connected, one hopes we’ll reach a positive tipping point of some sort before we reach a negative one.
I believe many vested power interests contrive to keep us feeling impotent, apathetic, and cynical. The truth, though, is that we have the power to help write the story ourselves.
↵ -
I think these are issues a lot of us think about daily– When I look at history and the social movements that have made life better for lots of people I am encouraged. Imagine how bleak the future might have looked during certain moments of the civil rights movement mid-century in the United States, or Indian Independence movement after the Amritsar Massacre, or Northern Ireland not too long ago from the perspective of those involved. They persevered and simply tried to do what was right.
Though I struggle all the time with it, I feel I have no right to be bleak or pessimistic.
My take on humans and their history is that we move in several directions simultaneously–in some spheres towards more justice, more peace, more connection; in other spheres, toward more advanced weapons, more divisive conflict, more disconnection. The 20th century saw advances in rights for women, minorities, gays & lesbians, workers. It also saw more world wars, civil wars, economic imperialism and advances in more abstract ways of killing more people.
Perhaps the trend in both directions will continue. But at least one thing does give me hope–that list Paul Hawken showed. Perhaps more people and organizations than ever are working toward peace and justice and there are more ways than ever for people to learn from one another.
↵ -
As long as religion exists in its present form, there will be no peace.
↵ -
As the world gets smaller there’s a chance.
Europe was at war a century or two ago, and is now generally at peace.
Hopefully, as communication and transport improves, the world will follow this trend over the next century or two.
↵






















